145 results found displaying 28-30
   
J Selwyn
 USA
Pollution Tracking Device Printer Friendly Version
I have an idea about pollution that may really stop industries and the gov't from dumping trash in our backyards! There are countless examples of companies dumping their trash, usually on the poor side of town.
I think that all companies and individuals should be ranked by how much trash/waste they produce. This could be done by producing trash cans & dumpsters with sensors that count the amount of mass in the container per week. For liquid waste (which many companies dump liberally into streams & oceans), a mandatory tracking device on all pipes shows how much waste is being released, and with what chemical makeup. People and companies have a moderate waste allowance per year, and a tally is kept automatically in a central system monitored by local citizens.
Here's the deal... the more you pollute (as shown by the tracking device), the closer city planners put local dumps to your location. So trash is not kept in one huge location out-of-town, but in small pockets near you. If you produce huge wasteful amounts of waste or small toxic ones, the community is notified and you get a nice plaque with a garbage can, presented by the mayor, at a ceremony before the town. Then you get trash from the community that you polluted. The dump would ideally be located near where the president or board of directors of the pollution company live. Brimming recycling cans or ecologically safe liquid waste would be balanced against your trash and reflected in your total account. To introduce this idea to a largely wasteful public, perhaps less waste could be tied to property tax benefits the first couple years (since it would cut down on city costs). I think that these tracking devices would not be hard to create (I welcome your messages), but real struggle is getting the gov't to agree.
So as a clause to the idea, if a huge polluter doesn't get the point of all this after a year, garbage is sent from the local dump to be buried in a special congressional dump for each representative of your community, who didn't crack down on the polluter in the first place.
Reward: Some credit, and a cleaner stream to swim in...
 

There are 7 replies to this idea



Want to use this idea? Check out the Site Concept as well as the Site Rules.
61°

   
Steve
 Austria
By Appointment to The Homeless Printer Friendly Version
Ever since I've been a kid, I've been wondering about that "By Appointment to Her Majesty The Queen" logo that you can find on so many products of the English-speaking world. Does SHE really need that many products? And above all - why should I care?
I propose introducing an entirely different logo: "By Appointment to The Homeless". Now that's something I might actually be interested in. It indicates that the product is actually given away to those in need (for FREE of course). Of course this would have to be monitored somehow to prevent abuse, but after all, the "By Appointment to Her Majesty" thing is surely monitored as well, so maybe those people can take care of the other logo as well, then they'd be doing something useful for a change.


Post a reply to this idea

Want to use this idea? Check out the Site Concept as well as the Site Rules.
60°

   
rcwlee
 Australia
Anti-smoking perfume Printer Friendly Version
The problem to be solved: There are a lot of places where people are supposed not to smoke, e.g. public transportation, McDonalds, cinemas, shopping malls, public toilets, etc. However, there are always smokers they are nuts and do not respect other people's right at all. They simply ignore the rules and keep smoking. For the time being, there is not much we (people don't like passive smoking or don't like the smell) can do. These few culprits smokers can also cause a lot of damages, e.g. fire.
The solution: Can some big chemical manufacturers invent some anti-smoke perfume which can be spread publicly. The perfume is as fragrant as other French perfume and does not cause harm to anyone. However, if anyone tries to smoke under the perfumed environment, the chemical will simply react with the dust and narcotine and cause the smoker nausea and unwell and force the smoker to stop smoking immediately. I think it is a great idea and is totally commercially viable because I am sure a lot of the airlines companies, shopping malls management, cinema operators etc. will buy this anti-smoking perfume.
Reward: More fresh air and more mutual respect
 

There are 8 replies to this idea



Want to use this idea? Check out the Site Concept as well as the Site Rules.
60°

Results are currently sorted by "hottest". Click here to see the newest ideas first.
OFFSHORE