Creativity Pool Forums

Using visual cues plus memory and some sort of emotion reader, electodes can be used with a computer to enhance thought processes, using an advanced "learning" system that interpets mental symbols and stimuli, potentially including a range of meta-references such as books that have been read, preferred categories, interests, or psychological testing. The primary application as I see it is to enhance "genius," "innovation," and creative thinking, by coordinating with a parser to predict the "types" or typologies of ideas that are not most intelligent, but are rather most desirable to the "reader" or "user". Beyond that synapse, where desire can be used as a statistic of the arbitrary or non-arbitrary value of meaningful outputs (such as sentences or works of art, or entire computer games, or more formally, "ideas") parser becomes an intimate concept which adapts to the preferences and real advantages offered by the person using the machine. The more information provided to the machine the better, in proportion to complexity and perfection, because meta-tags of this type may be rejected any time that they are useless, simplifying the code. This can be adapted with the individual preferences of the user, say for no "philosophical" or no "psychological" results etc. Each of these major categories can be toggled into a looser and more or less perfectionistic genre such as "emotional" or "systematic" instead of psychological or philosophical. For example, theoretically it could be narrowed only to produce "haiku", "dialogues", or an "idea of text". Ideas like divination can be used as a baseline standard for developments that may be subtle or complex. The most important application of the electrode-willpower integrator is the streamline integration with advanced computer games that require a lot of specific input to create the most valuable outputs. In such games, a distinction is made between "generic" satisfaction and "individualized" personal meaning. Such things are not inherently chemical (although perhaps chemistry may get involved) but essentially the non-stimulated holds the authentic standard for the paradigm of the parser, because such a person necessarily has more original preferences---that is, information rather than chemistry is in that case the basis for parser results. But don't get sick with this idea, it is little nugats of this stuff that really matters for the future of technology.

Reward: I'd like to get a lot more adapted visual stimulus wihtout having to take a drug